Yesterday, Hamas commandos, operating from the Gaza Strip, launched a deadly raid in southern Israel. This raid that massacred civilians, also took them hostage and gathered them in Gaza as a bargaining token for an exchange. These war crimes are the result of an asymmetrical war, the war from the Weak to the Strong. In this type of conflict, the Weak uses unconventional rules of engagement. Through these actions, the Weak tries to destabilize the Strong, which, at least initially, feels obligated to respect the laws of force in the battle engagement. Unable to resolve the conflict by conventional means, the Strong will use its strength and all the means at its disposal to crush the Weak. The Fort will justify its brutality, including war crimes, by arguing the initial crimes committed by the Weak.
The origin of this conflict lies in two elements.
First of all, there is Israel’s initial inability to foresee this aggression, which recalls the beginning of the Yom Kippur War. It started 50 years ago, almost to the day, and Israel, then, was not ready. In both cases, in the current conflict and in the Kippur War, it is possible to point to a disastrous failure of the intelligence services.
If the failure of the intelligence services will be resolved by a reorganization of the services and by the adjustment of the terms of their employment, the real cause of this fury’s outbreak must not be sought elsewhere than in Israel itself.
In the 1950s and until the Six-Day War in June 67, Israel government was leaning on the left. Certainly, many Palestinians who, at the instigation of the Arab belligerents during the War of Independence, had fled the territory that would become Israel, were excluded from their homeland, they were barred from returning home. The Palestinians who had not fled acquired Israeli nationality by right, rights somewhat almost identical to the rights granted to the Jews.
The 1967 war made it possible for Israel to reunify Jerusalem and take control of the Jordan territory on the west bank of the Jordan River. The Oslo agreements, by requiring Israel to give more or less fictitious autonomy on the West bank territories to a more or less corrupt Palestinian authority, created a fiction of a possible autonomy for the Palestinians. By enabling Jewish settlements in these territories, East Jerusalem and the West Bank of the Jordan River, the various governments will have established a functional apartheid that could only generate frustration.
Icing on the cake, faced with the impossibility of finding a majority with a real government program, Netanyahu by trying to turn Israeli democracy into an autocracy of the “White Jewish Supremacy”, this government will have destroyed the feeling of unity of the nation. Massive demonstrations take place every week to challenge the change in the functioning of the republic, a change that involves shifting the primacy of the judiciary branch in favor of the executive branch. This challenge is also found among soldiers who refuse to serve.
As long as the autocratic threat tries to impose itself, as long as functional apartheid is exercised, as long as the government of Israel promotes the illegitimate appropriation of territories, as long as the means for a real peace have not been put in place, when the pressure is too high, the boiler will explode. True, it is easier said than done, but leaving the keys of power to a corrupt autocrat, this selfish blindness will maintain the causes of the next explosions.
Today, Israel is at an impasse and as long as the apartheid right is in power, Israel cannot become a peaceful republic. And in this, she is unfortunately not alone.