Archives de l’auteur : jlc

Tautology

March 7, 2020

Tautology is a form of expression in which repetition, whether lies or untruths, is worth demonstration. For example :

God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.
God’s word expressed in the Bible places the earth at the center of the Universe.

You cannot, from now on, deny the reality of this Divine affirmation.

In politics, Bankrupt Pinocchio uses tautology as a persuasion tool.
May this sinister character join in hell the Pope who led
Giordano Bruno to the pyre.

()

 

La Tautologie

7 mars 2020

La tautologie est une forme d’expression dans laquelle la répétition, fusse de mensonges ou contre-vérités, vaut démonstration. Par exemple :

La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.
La parole divine exprimée dans la très Sainte Bible place la terre au centre de l’Univers.

Vous ne pouvez, désormais, nier la réalité de cette Divine affirmation.

En politique, Bankrupt Pinocchio, alias Donald Trump, pratique la tautologie en espérant qu’elle aura une vertu pédagogique. Que ce sinistre personnage rejoigne en enfer le pape qui a conduit au bûcher Giordano Bruno.

()

 

Balade dans le parc Tree Top

4 mars 2020

Parti promener les chiens de Susan, j’ai croisé un groupe de jeunes, amoureux de leurs bagnoles, si amoureux qu’ils s’étaient regroupés pour une séance photo.Vous noterez l’absence du sexe dit faible.La balade s’est poursuivie jusqu’à un belvédère d’où l’on peut observer la vie sauvage locale.Les mammifères supérieurs photographiés ici ne sont pas intégrés dans la nomenclature « Vie Sauvage », ils m’accompagnaient.

La suite du reportage est consacré à la vie aquatique et tout particulièrement aux tortues.Certains individus, probablement SDF n’entretiennent pas leur carapace comme il se doit.
Les algues en sont la preuve.Ici deux individus de bonne famille, l’absence d’algue le prouve, taillent la bavette.Enfin, pour clore cette séquence, deux individus, l’un mâle l’autre femelle.
Saurez-vous me dire qui est qui ?

Pour me faire parvenir votre réponse, cliquez ici.

()

Money talk

March 5, 2020

There are two types of systems, first order and second order. But what is the difference between the two systems. Easy, just read Sapiens by Yuval N. Harari. To put it simply, reliable predictions in a first-order system do not affect their outcome, for example the Weather Forecast. On the other hand, in a second order system, the more reliable the predictions, the less they are realized, for example those concerning the financial markets.

In Paul Krugman’s interview, two points are clarified.

  1. the impossibility of predicting short-term economic fluctuations.
  2. The rehabilitation of Bernie Sanders and his electoral program centered around a public health system accessible to all.

It is good to hear that finally an American explains that the word “Socialist” is not a dirty word. Paul Krugman says about Bernie Sanders, a politician that the right wing of the Republican party insists to qualify as a social-communist scarecrow, is in fact only a center-left social democrat.

With the arrival on the voting market of “Millennials”, the generation following the “Babies Boomers”, are the clichés of the Cold War (1948-1989) finally on the decline?

Listen to a Nobel Prize in Economics, literacy is not a crime.
A little modesty, however immense, never killed anyone.

To share your opinion, click here.

()

Et si on parlait d’économie

5 mars 2020

Il existe deux types de systèmes, ceux du premier ordre et ceux du deuxième ordre. Mais quelle différence il y-a-il entre les deux. Facile, il suffit de lire Sapiens de Yuval N. Harari. Pour faire simple, les prédictions fiables dans un système du premier ordre n’affectent pas leur réalisation, par exemple la Météo. En revanche dans un système du deuxième ordre, plus les prédictions sont fiables, moins elles se réalisent, par exemple celles concernant les marchés financiers.

Dans la courte intervention de Paul Krugman, deux points sont éclairés.

  1. l’impossibilité de prédire les fluctuations de l’économie sur le court terme.
  2. La dédiabolisation de Bernie Sanders et son programme électoral centré autour d’une système de santé public accessible à tous.

Il est heureux d’entendre qu’enfin un américain explique que le mot « Socialiste » n’est pas un gros mot. Paul Krugman ajoute à propos Bernie Sanders, homme politique que la droite du parti Républicain s’applique à le qualifier d’épouvantail socialo-communiste, n’est en fait qu’un social-démocrate de centre gauche.

Avec l’arrivée sur le marché des votants de la vague des « Millenials », la génération qui suit les « Babies Boomers », les poncifs de la guerre froide (1948-1989) seraient-ils enfin sur le déclin ?

Pour vous en convaincre, écoutez donc un Prix Nobel d’Economie.
Un peu de modestie, fut-elle immense, n’a jamais tué personne.

Pour partager un point de vue, cliquez ici.

()

Political Correctness – 2

3 mars 2020

The English text is after the pictures.

Comme le petit père Marcel (Proust de son nom de famille), je me suis souvent demandé si les pecnots savaient à la fois conduire et se conduire. Certes au plan phonétique cela semble relever d’une démarche semblable. La photo ci-dessous prouve le contraire : l’empaffé qui a garé son Pick-Up truck à côté de mon jouet possède probablement un permis de conduire. Toutefois, vu la façon avec laquelle il a abandonné son machin, il me semble que le permis de conduire qui lui a été attribué, probablement par erreur, ne devrait lui ouvrir l’accès qu’aux routes de campagne et non à la ville où le savoir se conduire s’impose comme un complément de formation à la conduite qu’il n’a jamais envisagé de passer.I always wondered if all the Red Necks had a driving license. Please note that in French the verbs  » to Drive » and « to « Behave » are homonyms, i.e. they are pronounced the same way.

This Pick-Up Truck driver may have a driving license, he does not have a behavior one.

()

Political Correctness

March 3, 2020

The politically correct is meant to soften relationships. This attitude which consists in naming a blind man, a visually impaired person, an imbecile, a person with intellectual learning disabilities, opens the doors to ridicule. George Carlin had already dealt with this problem a long time ago.

In this era of the me too movement, the slightest compliment can turn nightmare. There is an undeniable difference between saying to a woman « you make me dream », pussy grabbing or even offering her a sofa promotion (French quidproquo for sex against promotion). Now a simple compliment, even benign, can backfire even if it was pronounced a long time ago.

This is what happened to Chris Matthew who announced his departure on TV,live, yesterday evening.

This journalist who was also a political actor, was pushed out by a scared television channel. This channel was anxious to offer to a politically shy audience a sacrificial offering on the altar of the political correctness.

To stay safe in today’s America avoid gallantry.
To stay safe, in this less than tolerant bigot society, avoid reminding people the basic rule of the separation of church and state.
This separation rule is now a reality of the past.

I loved America with my eyes closed
but today I am also clogging my ears.

()

Politiquement correct

3 mars 2020

Le politiquement correct ouvre les portes du ridicule. Nommer un aveugle, une personne à la vue déficiente, un imbécile, un handicapé de l’apprentissage intellectuel, ne change rien à la réalité. George Carlin avait déjà traité ce problème il y a fort longtemps.

En cette époque du « me too », le moindre compliment peut tourner vinaigre. Il existe une différence indéniable entre dire à une femme « vous me faîtes rêver », glisser sa main sous sa robe ou encore lui proposer une promotion canapé. Désormais un simple compliment, pas forcément élégamment formulé, peut se retourner contre vous même s’il fut prononcé il y a fort longtemps.

Hier soir Chris Matthew, commentateur politique célèbre, aura annoncé son départ en direct.

Ce journaliste qui fut aussi acteur politique, a été poussé dehors par une chaîne de télévision frileuse. Dans un climat délétère, cette chaîne s’est sentie contrainte d’offrir à un public politiquement timide mais, grâce à dieu, armé jusqu’aux dents, une offrande expiatoire.

Il n’est pas bon aujourd’hui en Amérique de faire montre de galanterie.
Dans cette société où la bigoterie devient la règle, la séparation de l’église et de l’état est désormais une réalité du passé.

Pour reprendre cette remarque de Guy Bedos à propos du parti socialiste, j’affirme que :

j’aimais l’Amérique les yeux fermés
mais aujourd’hui je me bouche aussi les oreilles.

()

Le club d’avion en visite

Jacques, un ami de longue date, est venu nous rendre visite en Floride.
Quelques jours avant son arrivée, la météo était simplement exécrable.Un temps à ne même pas mettre une grenouille dehors.Afin de préparer sa visite dans les meilleures conditions possibles, nous avons prévu un tour de Shopping dans les nouvelles boutiques à la mode.
Ils y proposent des produits miracles à base de CBD et THC.Manquant d’enthousiasme pour les produits dérivés du Cannabis, Jacques et son épouse sont venus s’informer sur les beautés de la Libre Entreprise.Tous deux se sont laissés séduire et ont pris une participation active dans son développement.Tout séduits qu’ils étaient, il leur restait à prendre la route pour prêcher la Bonne Parole.C’est déterminés qu’il ont pris la route, prêts à convaincre les infidèles que nous, les pilotes certifiés train rentrant, hélice à pas variable et plus de 250CV, nous savons, et pas seulement de Marseille, tenir la tenir, la route.

()

Russia / USA – English

February 22, 2020

At the end of 2019, a long biographical documentary about Mikhail Khodorkovsky was released. You are more than likely not familiar with this name. This is not abnormal, because you have few reasons to be interested in the political life of post-USSR Russia. That said, the arrival of an atypical politician at the White House, a politician who, to remain polite, shines the boots of the current President of Russia for no apparent reason, this relationship between these two politicians will have pushed me into the theater where the documentary  » Citizen K » is screened .

This film funded by Amazon, the company of Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the USA, is a defense of Mikhail Khodorkovsky. This documentary is also a delightful indictment of Vladimir Putin and his regime.

Looking back over your shoulder

Autocratic regimes, Soviet in the USSR, Nazi from 1933 in Germany, Fascist in Musolinian Italy; these regimes negate checks and balances and therefore they offer the comfort of the absence of criticism and or sanction. These regimes dream of being eternal. Fortunately with the wear of time, through a decisive military defeat or an institutional overthrow, the dreamed eternity shows its limits.

At the end of 1989, the fall of the Berlin Wall announced the end of the myth of the march towards Communism through the dictatorship of the proletariat. Marxism-Leninism was no longer desirable. The secretary general of the Communist Party of the USSR understood it. He opened a desired peaceful transition to a democracy. At this very moment, capitalist democracy was more in line with the aspirations of the peoples of Eastern Europe than Communism. In the beginning this transition seemed to be able to progressively evolve under the leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev. Unfortunately  the supporters of the former Soviet regime attempted a military coup. This failed coup did put an end to a transition that everyone hoped to be gradual towards a peaceful democracy .

The defeat of this military coup linked to the apparent weakness of Gorbachev, will have pushed on the front stage a populist careerist of the Communist Party, Boris Yeltsin. The latter will take advantage of Gorbachev’s weakness to take power and he will launch, without restraint, the privatization of the economy. The chosen method, a method which it is impossible to describe within the framework of this article, this privatization allowed a restricted number of insiders from the seraglio to confiscate the privatization vouchers offered to the public. This phase of privatization, uncontrolled by democratic bodies, will concentrate in the hands of a few oligarchs, the entire profitable economy of the former USSR. Mikhail Khodorkovsky is one of the gangsters who, through the bank he created, took control of the oil company YUKOS.

The documentary Citizen K part one

The first part of the documentary describes the rise of Mikhail Khodorkovsky without hiding the mafia aspects of his rise to a financial fortune. The documentary then attempts to legitimize this capture of wealth by highlighting the management methods of Mikhail Khodorkovsky. The aim of this management was to give the YUKOS company a form of management in accordance with Western capitalist canons. The restructuring of the company offered to the stock holders a way to enter the western stock markets. This introduction valued the company at a high value and thus allowed Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the main shareholder, to become the richest man in the new Russia.

While Mikhail Khodorkovsky strengthened his company and his fortune, Vladimir Putin, by using his position at the head of the Russian state, was enriched by buying at low prices, via shell companies, oil extraction rights that he sold at a high price.

Taking advantage of his immense wealth, Mikhail Khodorkovsky chose to enter politics through the door of the economy. Having created his fortune in a mafia jungle, he now wishes to give himself an image of defender of democracy and champion of the fight against corruption. In fact, by offering a more moral political alternative, he is trying to open a path towards a democratic takeover and overthrow the mafia that revolves around Vladimir Putin.

Sure of his fact, thinking he had the support of public opinion, he attacked Putin’s power head on. At this very moment the narration switches. Putin, who is holding the justice system of the Russian state, imprisons Khodorkovsky for tax evasion and takes the opportunity to appropriate YUKOS. The imprisonment of Khodorkovsky into Siberian prisons will last nine years. He will be released and expelled to Germany under pressure from Angela Merkel but also, and probably above all, to heal the image of the Kremlin on the occasion of the Sochi Olympic Games.

Citizen K documentary part two

The second part of the documentary is mainly filmed in London. It consists of a long interview with the exiled Khodorkovsky in which he explains his objective of overthrowing Putin’s kleptocracy and replacing it with a democracy. By choosing to finance people and opposition groups to Putin, Khodorkovsky gives himself the beautiful role of the humanist defender of democracy. Incidentally he explains that his personal fortune allows him to do so, that this objective is just and virtuous. As he is both rich and patient, Khodorkovsky expresses his certainty that in the end history will prove him right.

What about similarities found in the 2020 America

At the end of February 2020, America is experiencing, as it occurs every four years, the fever of the campaign for the presidential election. The current president, president whose mode of corrupt populist governance resembles that of his Kremlin counterpart, finds on his way a self-made billionaire, Michael Bloomberg. Michael Bloomberg spends his personal money without counting for the nomination as the candidate of the Democratic party. If as of today Bernie Sanders, a social democrat (in the European sense) a socialist-communist (in the sense of the US far-right), leads the race to the nomination, the November election could well show a contest between a bankrupt ex-billionaire and a real billionaire who managed to buy access to the election.

For both Russia and the USA, it is not reassuring to think that money powers the defense of democracy, even if the two oligarchs Khodorkovsky and Bloomberg show virtue. If money becomes the only mean of gaining power, the death of Democracy is not far away. That said, France, despite a law which limits the budgets of electoral campaigns, is not free from reproaches. The campaign accounts of a former president have been refused by the Court of Auditors. The faulty president has still not been sanctioned.

And you, what do you think. Share your thoughts by clicking here .

()